Harry Potter Book 7 - Rumors, Facts and Ideas
Harry Potter Book 7 - Rumors, Facts and Ideas
Strange rumor site about the coming 7th Harry Potter book. At least half the items listed here appear to be wild guesses.
# Rowling has said in a recent interview that we will be told what James and Lily Potter did when they were alive and how they became so wealthy. She also said that there are going to be more deaths in the coming books.
[UPDATE]
Book 7 is ready for pre-oder at Amazon now!
Discuss it here.
i think that harry and ginny will get back together because i don’t think ginny would just give up like that.
ron and hermione will get together, and the trio won’t go back to school but go to the potter family home. ginny will probaly want to go to but who knows wat her mom will say.
Comment by Amanda — October 17, 2005 @ 5:20 pm
I expect that Harry and Ginny will get back together. With the pending wedding and all, it’s bound to happen. Love is difficult to supress, especially in fiction.
My most pressing question though is:
Did Snape kill Dumbledore because of the unbreakable vow, or is he really on Voldomort’s side?
Of course knowing that answer would give a lot of the coming plot away and spoil at least some of the suspense.
Comment by Anton — October 17, 2005 @ 7:08 pm
im in a slight doubt bout the fact that snape killed dumbledore,cause when snape performs the avada kadavra curse dumbledore is flung back when we very well know,that so far whoever the curse is been used on the person just falls lifeless to the ground and is not flung back,anyways im not sayin that its not possible that dumbledores dead,there is a possibility,but what im tryin to say is that if j.k really did wanna kill dumbledore she should have made it a heroic death,where deumbledore puts up a valiant fight,but here he doesnt even touch a death eater, and when he says “severus please..” maybe hese pleadin snape to perform the curse. U guys should check out this site http://www.dumbledoreisnotdead.com it will really be comfortin and will give hope to all those who are really grieved by dumbledores death.
Comment by Saad Merchant — October 22, 2005 @ 2:23 am
Thanks for the pointer. I know a few people that’ll be interested in reading the site. I’ll post a blog entry about it later this weekend so it gets some more publicity.
Comment by Anton — October 22, 2005 @ 8:23 am
i dunno.. rowling can come up wid astonishing things.. i just want sirius and dumbledore back.. saad merchant is quite rite… it wasnt right for a wizard like dumbledore to die just like that .. i hated it when he died. i just hope his spirit or soul or ghost stays back
Comment by Karen — October 22, 2005 @ 4:36 pm
More info, clues, and discussion linked from this article:
http://lr2.com/archives/2005/10/23/dumbledore-is-not-dead/
Comment by Anton — October 25, 2005 @ 3:13 pm
Karen,
I would certainly like to believe that Sirius is coming back, but I haven’t seen any good clues that he is. The whole business of Kreature now belonging to Harry makes it seem that he’s gone for good.
Comment by Anton — October 25, 2005 @ 3:15 pm
what is regulas blacks middle name
Comment by rose black — October 26, 2005 @ 8:13 am
Many people are speculating that his middle initial is A, and that RAB is in fact Sirus’ little brother. I looked through OOTP quickly but didn’t see any mention of his middle name. He did have an uncle with an A name, so that’s a likely middle name, but I don’t think we’ll know for sure until the next book.
Comment by Anton — October 26, 2005 @ 9:43 am
why did Harry use the fire to try to contact Sirius?
(After he had the dream that he was in the department of mysteries)
he had to create a diversion and everything for Umbridge when he coul of just used the two way mirror
then he would of spoken directly to Sirius.
Ijust wonderred if anyone had an explanation for this
I think Dumbledore will be back, by using his portrait in his old office.
Comment by Holly — October 26, 2005 @ 9:45 am
Harry didn’t “re-discover” the mirror until after Sirius’ death. I get the impression that it had completely slipped his mind until he found it burried in his trunk. Remember that Sirius told Harry not to look at it as he left the house and I don’t think it’s mentioned again until after his death.
It had to be one of those “doh” moments, although the book doesn’t dwell on that. Might be time to listen to OOTP and HBP again.
Comment by Anton — October 26, 2005 @ 11:12 am
I believe Snape killed dumbledore as a ploy to make Voldemort sure of his allegiance to him, but at the same time transterring some sort of power in to harry, because if it were a malevolent act he would have killed harry already because he saw and knew and it completely destroyed his name. Snape will be redeemed.
Comment by Joseph — October 28, 2005 @ 12:59 pm
i think that R.A.B Means burke, coz in book 6 they said that the person knew Tom and he did work for him.
Comment by Luke — October 30, 2005 @ 12:24 pm
Well,I am more than sure that Snape killed Dumbledor…and…I am almost that sure that Harry will kill either Snape or Bellatrix Lestrange in book 7.He hates them both so much,because they both killed 2 of the most important presons in his life!!!Well,I also think that either Ron or Hermione will die…and I am not absolutely sure that Harry will survive…Though I think that he will do Voldemort in because,after all,it is a book for children,and I suppose that J.K.R. will not disappoint all of her readers…
buy….
P.S. Sorry mor all my mistekes,but my English is not that good…after all I am not an English-speking guy!!!!
whoever wanna connect me,write here: radomircho@abv.bg
Comment by Fresher — October 31, 2005 @ 9:07 am
I think that Dumbledore has to be really dead as his portrait has appeared on the wall of what was his office and only past headmasters do that. I am sure this would not happen if he were still alive. Comments please. I also believe that Snape was asked by Dumbledore to kill him as Dumbledore knows a lot of very old magic like that he put on the Dursleys house and I am sure there must be some which involves a sacrifice to either give Harry more powers, help him destroy the Horcruxes or the at will weaken Voldemort. I also feel that Snape had opportunities earlier to kill Dumbledore if he really wanted to. How about all the times that Dumbledore has gone to him for different potions like for his blackened hand before he went for Harry. I Snape had to kill him it would have been so much easier to do it where no one could see and then leave the grounds without suspecion instead of in front of eveyone as he must have been aware of what Drago had to do as he himself said he was close to Voldemort and was probably told. I am not sure if Harry will die or not in the Book 7 but I would like to think that he does not however he would have to learn a lot more skills currently to defeat Voldemort and he does not have many people to teach him these at the moment. He would have to become more disciplined and close his mind or Voldemort might even be aware of what he is doing in destroying the Horcruxes. Wormtail could play a part in Voldemorts downfall as he still owes Harry for saving his life and the debt would have to be paid.
Comments please anyone as I would be interested to know what you think
Comment by Clare — October 31, 2005 @ 11:41 am
completely different subject, but i think that either dobby or all the house elves will help out harry. one, because hermione started the spew club. two, they can do things that normal wizards cant, like do powerful magic without a wand. and, this is just a theorie but, i think that dobby or kreacher will go into a hideout of the death eaters thats got hexes on it preventing apperation. heres why. in book 2 when harry got attacked by the bludger dobby apparated to tell him it was him that made the bludger go after him. then, in book six, dobby and kreacher both apparate into the boys dorm to tell harry what draco has been doing. now im not sure if they were there in book 2, but in book six, at least, there were extra hexex preventing wizards from apparating into hogwarts and onto hogwarts school grounds. thats why harry and dumbledore had to walk out to hogsmead before apparating to go get the horcrux. dobby and kreacher could still do it. jk doesnt mess up a plot like that. i really think it means something, just no one took that into thought. email me your oppinions at syk_verses@sbcglobal.net
Comment by andy — November 3, 2005 @ 1:25 pm
i think jkr has done this part of killing dumbledore with great thought..
we know tht dumbledore was really weak from the horcrux experience and had no strength left..he wasnt even able to stand up straight…and harry was bound by dumbledore’s spell so he cudnt help him…and snape murdered an absolutely defenceless(at the moment..) wizard…
think abt it…if dumbledore had been in perfect health…he wud obviously put up a good fight…HOW would ANYONE b able to kill him then…??
the only way was to make him weak, with his defences low…wandless…
and then…by killling dumbledore in such a manner,it makes the situation much worse…i mean this way we hate snape much more rite?? if dumbledore had put up a gud fight and had gone down like a hero, it wudn’t hv created such an effect…rite now everyone in the wizarding world is convinced tht snape is working for voldemort…
the only person who can tell for sure is jkr..!!
Comment by ron — November 7, 2005 @ 1:05 pm
Snape is most certainly a real death eater, whether people like to think that or not! HE killed Dumbledore, and there is no way that he is innocent. Also, I know R.A.B is not Bourke, because his first name is Caratacus.
Comment by Anonymous — November 12, 2005 @ 1:19 am
hmmmmmm
Comment by Ly — November 13, 2005 @ 6:59 pm
Think about this…yes Wormtail will repay harrys life because Dumbledore stated so in the 3rd book. And Dumbledore might not be dead. In the hp1 it says that dumbledore defeated the dark wizard of his time. (On the chocolate frog cards) So maybe in defeatig this dark wizard he created a horcrux for himself. Only time will tell…also the last word in hp7 is ’scar’ so i wonder… what does it relate to.
Also remeber when Dumbledore said,”Remember my last” in hp5…? Well maybe they had previously corresponded… Why not say “remeber my last letter?”
Comment by Emanga — November 19, 2005 @ 1:36 am
Emanga said:
> Also remeber when Dumbledore said,â€Remember my last†in hp5…?
> Well maybe they had previously corresponded… Why not say “remeber my last letter?â€
I don’t find that so odd. When the context is already set it’s not uncommon to use a pronoun as in “Remember my last one.” and after making that step, we can casually drop the pronoun. This does indicate that there is context and that there has been a dialog already, Perhaps in the form of a much more aticulate howler? It all ties into the magic that Dumbledore put on the house to protect Harry for as long as he can call it home.
Comment by Anton — November 20, 2005 @ 9:52 am
Several points.
1. Dumbledore and Sirius are most certainly dead. JKR would not kill off these two only to bring either or both of them back again - it would make all deaths, such as Cedric’s, seem less meaningful. It would seem as if as long as someone is a main character, we can know they cannot die - and that’s simply not so. They’re dead - accept it.
2. Most signs point to RAB being Regulus Black.
a. the initials RB, and an uncle with an A name…
b. RAB refers to Voldemorte as ‘The Dark Lord’ - as only Death Eaters do - which Regulus was
c. the books have never specified the circumstances of Regulus’s death - only that he suddenly backed out of being a death eater and was killed. it is not unthinkable that before his death, he somehow slipped upon the information of one of Voldemort’s Horcruxes, and then managed to steal the locket (my theory is with the assistance of Kreacher, just like Harry helped Dumbledore, as Kreacher would not ‘count’ has a wizard) before being murdered by voldemorte. i think voldemorte knew that Regulus found about his Horcruxes (or at least one) and killed him, but he never realized that Regulus had stolen Slytherin’s locket and replaced it with a fraud.
the whole ‘RAB is Regulus’ is only a theory, but JKR did mention in an interview that she would be introducing no new characters in the seventh.
but, perhaps revealing RAB’s identity as a before unheard of person would not count as a new character, since the initials ‘RAB,’ and therefore the person whom RAB stands for, was introduced in book six.
we’ll have to wait and see, though, won’t we? email me any comments/arguments/whatever at mallory.mm@gmail.com
Comment by Melanie — November 20, 2005 @ 11:24 pm
I have a theory. What if Dumbledore has a horcrux??
Comment by ankurx13 — November 25, 2005 @ 1:50 am
So far we know that to create a horcrux that you must ‘murder’ someone. Would the defeat of the dark lord of Dumbledore’s time mentioned on the chocolate frog card count as murder?
Comment by Anton — November 26, 2005 @ 4:51 pm
though i think it really stinks that dumbledore is dead, i think he wont come back cause as said before it would make the story a little weak. I think snape will be very important in the next story whether he is good or bad. It is also mentionend on other sites that the eyes of lilly and of harry will be very important and that snape loved lily. That would explain his hatred against james and maybe his love for lily will win it from his hate for james and he will help Harry. It could also be that snape always has been good cause i think it is strange that dumbledore trusts snape so good that he doesnt want to talk about it but then suddenly snape kills him. thats not the style of jk. Im really looking forward to book 7 but i fear it will take some time brb
Comment by The_priest — November 28, 2005 @ 2:08 pm
ok, i personally think Dumbledore is dead, i would absolutly LOVE for him to be alive, but i think hes gone. As for sirius, i don’t think hes dead. If you look at the way Sirius died and the way all the other characters in these books die, theres a difference. All the other characters, J.K.R. had mad it soo completly obvious they had died. She TOLD US the color of the spell and she wrote someone actually saying the avada kedavra curse. With sirius, it was a red jet of light. which i am under the impression that only the green avada… curse kills people. Although i have red about the veil being some kind of heaven or hell type thing, but since hes not actually deaad..couldnt they just pull him out???
Also, is it just me or did Harry except the fact dumbledore was dead pretty quickly. He refused to believe it with Sirius, and yet he had known Dumbledore much longer, and had seen him much more then sirius.
i dunno, just my thoughts…
Comment by Me — November 28, 2005 @ 7:05 pm
Is it possible for people to be horcruxes?
If so, what if voldemorte made a horcrux of Harry whne he killed James and Lily? THat woul.d give a better explanation on why voldemort can connect with Harry’s mind
ANother thought, it said in HBP that Voldemort would have put somethin gfrom Gryffindor.
What if Harry is the heir to Gryffindor and he is the horcrux from Gryffindor?
Just athought, might be wrong.
Comment by Marc — November 28, 2005 @ 7:35 pm
look remember what slughorn said to created a horcruzes your heart must be cold ruthless for other words a murdurer
Comment by horcruzes — November 28, 2005 @ 8:03 pm
To horcruzes- what does that say though?
Comment by Marc — November 28, 2005 @ 9:00 pm
IMPORTANT FACT: In Book 1 Snape makes a speech in which he explains that he can even stopour death!!!! I wonder what meaning that will take in book 7
Comment by B_Toria — November 29, 2005 @ 12:48 pm
Also to horcruzes: Slughorn doesn’t say that you had to have a cold ruthless heart. He just says that not a lot of wizards would have wanted to tear their soul once let alone 7 times. He says that it should be kept in tact.
Comment by Esme — November 29, 2005 @ 6:36 pm
I think Harry likes Ron and I can prove it because it was the most important thing to him. I mean why couldn’t it be Hermione or Cho. Now that all u little Harry Potter freaks have learned the truth don’t u feel like u’ve spent all this time over nothing. If u have any comments u can send them to ladybuges34@yahoo.com. EVERYTHING’S ABOUT TO CHANGE, ISN’T IT.——-what do u think that means? i ‘M GONNA WRITE MY OWN hARRY pOTTER books now….they’re gonna be awesome..like me. Harry Potter needs to work out he looks like a fallen off dieing twig.HaHAhaHA I’VE UNCOVERED THE MISTERY OF Y THEY LIKE TO SNEAK INTO DARK PLACES TOGETHER. tHEY LIKE TO BE CLOSE WHO KNOWS WHAT HAPPENS IN THAT SKOOL WHEN THE LIGHTS ARE OUT…THEY DO SLEEP IN THE SAME ROOM DON’T THEY.. VERY ODD
Comment by Jackie — November 29, 2005 @ 6:47 pm
i dont think that dumbledore is dead because, when you are killed with avada kedavra u die with your eyes open, dumbledores eyes are closed
the last horcruxe is harry’s scar
Comment by blah — November 29, 2005 @ 10:03 pm
i think snape is innocentas wen dumby was ‘desperately injured’ after gettin d ring, ‘timely action of Prof.snape’ and his own magic savedhim. i mean y couldnt he just kill dumby then &dere an mke it look an accident
#$@ git!!
Comment by gseeker#1 — November 30, 2005 @ 8:42 am
I also think Snape is innocent. Hagrid said that he heard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Dumbledore said that Snape had promised to do it and that he couldn’t say no now. The book also says that Snape looked disgusted when he was about to kill Dumbledore. He looked disgusted for what he was about to do not because he hated Dumbledore. Also, when Harry called Snape a coward, Snape stops running and tells him not to call him a coward. You have to be really brave when you’re about to kill someone on their orders.
Comment by Esme — November 30, 2005 @ 6:14 pm
I think Mrs. Weasly will die in the seventh book. Just think about it. All of Harry’s parent figures have been killed by Voldemort or his followers. Lily, James, Sirius, and Dumbledore. I don’t think it will be Mr. Weasly because Harry likes him but I don’t think he thinks of him as a father. If you have any comments e-mail me at pinkchickme153@yahoo.com
Comment by Esme — November 30, 2005 @ 6:19 pm
Snape is innocent and it was a plan from the start fro Dumbledore to die. However, Dumbledore is dead and will not be coming back. If so, I will be dissapointed becasue it would de vlaue other deaths and make some peopple seem immortal. This is too much of a fantasy for JKR, so Dumbledore is really dead. Snape will be important in the next book once Harry finds out hes good. I am pretty sure about this but it is still only a prediction
Comment by Marc — December 1, 2005 @ 7:32 pm
i think nevile’s new wand will be important in the next book because it was the last one olivander sold.
Comment by crazylady — December 2, 2005 @ 11:34 am
i believe that dumbledore is not truly dead…the fact that the whole big thing dumbledore’s and harry’s lessons lead up to horcruxes is a very big clue…although horcruxes are considered possibly the most dark thing in all the aspects of the dark arts and dumbledore was not an evil guy…but think about it dumbledore’s a very powerful wizard…he has most likely killed someone at one point or another making him very capable to have put part of his soul into a horcrux how many who knows…also even when harry did find out the apparently entire reason for dumbledore trusting snape i think this will be more elaborated in the 7th book and there might be some other reasons as well
Comment by sarah — December 5, 2005 @ 8:28 pm
R.A.B is regulas black serious’s brothur
because in the fifth book it says regulas had a locket that no one could open and the horcrux is a locket.
Comment by Catie — December 6, 2005 @ 3:13 pm
i think sirris will come back because in ootp it dosent even explain his death so maybe harry will fight alongside his godfather.
Comment by harry potter — December 10, 2005 @ 8:36 am
and r.a.b could be regulas because who else could it be
Comment by harry potter — December 10, 2005 @ 8:38 am
i was just wondreeing wen is book 7 coming out
Comment by harry potter — December 10, 2005 @ 8:40 am
please can someone reply
Comment by harry potter — December 10, 2005 @ 8:44 am
where is everyone?
Comment by harry potter — December 10, 2005 @ 10:44 am
ok so i was sort of thinking about trelawneys prediction about harry and voldemort and i totally think that harry is voldemorts last horocrux, and that in the next book…harry will destroy all the horocruxs and not be able to find the last one (because its him) and then he will battle Voldemort and Voldemort will kill harry, making him mortal again, and then neville will kill harry because neville, like harry could have been the “chosen one” but Voldemort just assumed it was Harry, how can he be so sure that it was?
Comment by Shawn — December 12, 2005 @ 8:37 pm
sorry i messed up in the last comment, i ment that neville will kill voldemort…sorry
Comment by Shawn — December 12, 2005 @ 8:37 pm
look harry is not the final horocrux because you can use something like the slytherin locket , hufflepuffs cup, something of gryfindoors and ravenclaws. I think that the final horocux is voldemorts snake.
Comment by Andrew — December 18, 2005 @ 2:39 pm
Harry cant be a horcrux because voldemort tried to killed him at least thrice..so he wouldnt destroy his own horcrux.. would he?
Comment by kakas — December 20, 2005 @ 6:30 am
i think that when snape made the unbreakable promise he went right away and told dumbledore..dumbledore knew that it was his final year with harry and thats why he was trying to show him as much as possible and he didnt seem as shocked to all the things that were happening, he froze harry b/c he knew what was about to happen and he knew harry was going to try and help if he wasnt frozen and when he said severus please he was telling severus to murder him even if he didnt want to..because he had to still look like he was on the dark lord’s side…but i think snape is still good b/c he made up and excuse not to kill harry and was still trying to warn him that he was going to need to be able to close his mind to defeat volermort…
also on another note i do believe that harry is the final horcurx and after he kills voldermort he will have to kill himself (i also liked the idea that neville is somehow involved b/c he could have just as easily been the chosen one) there are many things pointing to this..for one thing jk rowling said that she thought the second book was giving too much away about the 7th and the second is all about the horcrux of voldermort getting into another human being( ginny) and taking control…also the scar “connects” harry and voldermort in a way similar to the snake which is a horcurx..so i think they are connected the same..this is also why there is only 7 books to me..everyone dies and then there is no more story
Comment by alex — December 23, 2005 @ 6:38 am
also to answer why voldermort tried to kill harry if he put a part of himself inside…even though harry is a horcrux..harry wants to kill all the other parts of voldermort and then will probably kill himself to make sure voldermort is gone..so voldermort wants to kill him to preserve all his other horcruxs and himself
Comment by alex — December 23, 2005 @ 6:42 am
hi yall look! Harry could not be the final horcrux. why i’ll tell you voldemort used the Advanda kedeva currse and backfire. so the proposey says that voldemort will create a equall.
Comment by Andrew — January 3, 2006 @ 7:39 pm
events happingning in book 7.
1.harry ron and hermonime will go to fluers and bills weeding. also bill will turn into a warewolf.
2.then harry ron and hermonime will then go to the durselys for the final time.
3.harry will become 17 and harry and ron will take the apparition test.
4.harry ron and hermonime will then go to godric hollow while there on the way find a swarm of dementors.
5.next harry ron and hermonime will then search for the slythering’s locket, cup of hufflepuff oh and by the way even though voldemort created traps harry may have to face someting from founders, also something of gryfindoor and ravenclaw and the snake.
6.then harry will try and killed voldemort and everyone voldemort killd will be set free.
Comment by Andrew — January 3, 2006 @ 7:48 pm
1. I expect the book will open preparing for the wedding.
2. Harry will probably drop in at the Dursley’s house once just to fulfill Dumbeldore’s protective spell.
3. It’s a given that Harry will turn 17, but I doubt that there will be any test. The ground has been laid for a huge split in the wizarding community and I suspect that Harry and friends won’t be on the Ministry’s side.
4. I do agree we will see more of the dementors but I won’t venture a guess as to when or where.
5. It could be that R.A.B. got off to a good start on destroying the horcruxes. I’m sure Harry will have to deal with one or more of them though.
6. I don’t believe any of Voldemort’s victims will be set free. It’s been stated too many times in the book that death is for real and not reversable.
I also believe that Dumbledore is dead and not coming back. Harry has to stand on his own to defeat he who must not be named. It’s nice to think that he’ll return, either because he faked his death, or he’ll be reborn like a phoenix, but I don’t think he will.
Comment by Anton — January 4, 2006 @ 12:26 am
I THINK THAT HARRY HIM SELF IS A HOROCRUX. ONE J.K IS SAYING “WHY DID DUMBLEDORE NOT KILL VOLDERMORT.” WELL BEACAUSE HE KNOWS THAT SOME OF VOLDERMORT WENT INTO HARRY.
Comment by MAY ANNA — January 9, 2006 @ 5:58 pm
well….
i think that dumbledore is still alive and that the barman in the pub is dumbledores brother and that they swapped places so dumbledore wernt killed at all. harry always said that the barman looked strangley familiar!! and dumbledore had alredy helped him out (his bro) with a situation (can’t remember what it was it is in a previous book) so now aberforth (his ro) owed dumbledore a favor so he swapped places with him and his bro was killed!!
comments plz!!
Comment by mastermind — January 14, 2006 @ 3:37 pm
I think that fawkes is a horcrux of dumbledore. Well think about it fawkes the phoenix can never die for he will be reborn from his ashes. Dumbledore, given doesn’t appear to be a wizard that uses this type of dark magic, but he has gotta do what he has gotta do. I thinkmastermind has a good theory but wouldn’t everyone notice a difference and so what if harry said aberforth looked familiar. He has been around dumbledore a lot so why wouldn’t he just say aberforth looks like dumbledore. I think its 75% given that harry’s a horcrux of Voldemort. we know the last word is scar how do we not know that harry said avada kedavra and pointed it at his scar. It could also be that hermione says harry wher’s ur scar after the struggle with voldemort. I think its 99.9% sure that harry will die well we’ll just see about everything in 07. Please tell me what you think of my possibilities.
Comment by Ajey — January 15, 2006 @ 3:28 am
i think that there will be a strong connection between lily and snape - having some sort of history behind them…We know that a lot of details regarding harry’s potters will be revealed but who by? Could it be Snape that tells harry..maybe what he doesn’t want to hear?
Comment by mysterious@_lily — January 15, 2006 @ 10:47 am
I think that Snape for sure is not a follower of Voldermort because in the first potions lesson harry ever had Snape says he can put a stopper on death. Well if he knew how to do this wouldn’t he tell Voldermort? I think he told this info to both Sirius and Dumbledore so that they wouldn’t die. He could have also told lily because he had a crush on her so voldermort could not kill her. Another possibility is that Snape wants revenge from Voldermort for taking the life of his loved one Lily Potter.
Comment by Ajey — January 15, 2006 @ 8:49 pm
Hmmm, that is very interesting about the barman and D. swiching places….
Comment by Katie — January 16, 2006 @ 8:04 pm
snape,voldemort are half bloods snape does not care about lily evans.
Comment by Andrew — January 17, 2006 @ 5:29 pm
i htink that harry’s scar will be the horcux and not him because if both him and voldemort die then it would leave this weird hole in the wizerding world. i also think that if harry dies and voldemort deos not then everything would just go to ruin. i do think that dumbledor is dead and that his only remnants with be the portrait in the headmaster’s office. as for sisios, i remeber in the fifth book harry said that he could here voices behind the curtin in which sirios fell through. he said it sounded like conversation, so maybe he isn’t really dead after all and just stuck n some kind of weird limbo. as for lilly and snapes hidden love affare, i believe that snape may have had a crush on lily but you would think if this was so then he’d have treated her son with a little more respect in private if not in public. i do think that snape is good because although i belive dumbledor is dead the sercumstanses were still a little weird. as foor wormtail paying back harry, i don’t think that will happen because wormtail is nothing but a courd and he will stay on whatever side has the most power just to keep himself alive. i absolutly disagree with the moron who siad that harry and ron were gay and i believe that harry and ginny wil go out and ron and hermione will to. although it is more than likly that one of rowling’s main charecters will die i don’t think that any will. the charecters have become very close with many readers and it doesn’t seem to fit the plot that one would die. i also think that somthing will happen in the 7th book to couse draco to turn against his father and join harry even though harry alone must face dumbldore. if any one of the main charecters did die though i would think that it would ron because his charecter is strong and unique but his physical atributes are week. he isn’t the brightest student either and i think if he were faced with a battle his odds aren’t great. if you can remember in ootp those brian thing had their way with him almost imideatly. i would love to here you comments so please e-mail me at PissyMissy15@aol.com
Comment by PissyMissy — January 18, 2006 @ 1:46 pm
I believe that in the seventh book Harry will die. because why would J.K.R write only seven books if the main character is still alive. Wouldn’t she write an eight book? plz reply
Comment by horcruxes — January 19, 2006 @ 5:14 am
i think that she isn’t going to write an 8th book maybe because like she said before in an interview, her last chapter is an epaloge of what is to happen to everyone who servives after school. maybe there just won’t be anything left to tell.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 19, 2006 @ 2:47 pm
well….
i think that dumbledore is still alive and that the barman in the pub is dumbledores brother and that they swapped places so dumbledore wernt killed at all. harry always said that the barman looked strangley familiar!! and dumbledore had alredy helped him out (his bro) with a situation (can’t remember what it was it is in a previous book) so now aberforth (his ro) owed dumbledore a favor so he swapped places with him and his bro was killed!!
comments plz!!
Comment by mastermind — January 20, 2006 @ 12:26 pm
i don’t think asking your unrecognised brother to die for you really fits into the chharecter of dumbledor. maybe harry did recognise him but you’d think seeing as dumbledor is somone harry looks up to that he’d have recognised his brother.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 20, 2006 @ 2:55 pm
Da following Qs have 2 b answered in da 7th bk:
-wats da title of da 7th book??
-wats da date of release of da 7th book?
Will harry die??Will voldemort die??or both?
Is dumbledore still alive??if yes….wat waz his plan?
Whos R.A.B?is R.A.B one person or more than one??is regulus black R.A.B?
Has da locket actually been destroyed?waz da locket found in da 5th bk da actual horcrux?
Will any of da weasleys die??
Why was olliwander missing?
Will da trio return 2 hogwarts in their 7th yr??
how will harry kill voldemort with his power to LOVE?
wat will b da information on lily n petunias past?
how did james n lily become so wealthy?
wat was da spell used by dumbledore on voldemort in da 5th bk?
wat will b nevilles reaction on knwing how close he waz in being da chosen one?
will hermione n ron get together??
will harry continue goin out wid ginny??
wat will happen in bill n fleurs marriage?
Snape is on whos side??is he helping harry in disguise?wat r da other things yet 2 b known about da unbreakable vow at spinners end??
Why was snape always so rude 2 harry??
wat made dumbledore believe dat snape is on his side??i.e-wat waz snapes story 2 convince dumbledore?
Wat is draco malfoys role in da 7th bk?will he come back 2 da rite side?
how many horcruxes r exactly left???and how will harry track down da other horcruxes?
is harry a horcrux??
Did da prophecy mean both have 2 kill each other?
will wormtails silver hand play any part in da 7th bk?
was there any1 outside snapes window at spinners end?
how will harry b grateful 1 day dat he saved wormtails life?i.e-in wat way will wormtail b indebted to harry?
how did snape convince voldemort dat he is on his side n not dumbledores??
will percy comeback 2 da rest of da weasleys?
if nagini is a horcrux will harrys parselmouth ability help 2 get rid of it?
does any1 from da order knw dumbledores still alive??(only if he is)
wat was snape n dumbledores argument all abt(da 1 which hagrid overheard?
who will be da new head boy and head girl??
will lupin n tonks get married??
from where did dumbledore learn mermish??
will any1 from da trio die?
how will knowing voldemorts past help harry survive??
wat are da hints in voldemorts past that will help harry??
wat will da characters do after hogwarts??
wat was da reason behind fawkes pecuilar behaviour after dumbledores death??
how will harrys last visit at da dursleys be?
will harry get anything at godrics hollow??
where will da final battle between harry and voldemort take place??
which are da new characters dat will b introduced in da 7th bk??
Comment by Anonymous — January 21, 2006 @ 9:16 am
well….
i think that dumbledore is still alive and that the barman in the pub is dumbledores brother and that they swapped places so dumbledore wernt killed at all. harry always said that the barman looked strangley familiar!! and dumbledore had alredy helped him out (his bro) with a situation (can’t remember what it was it is in a previous book) so now aberforth (his ro) owed dumbledore a favor so he swapped places with him and his bro was killed!!
Also harry wil get killed!!! no i rly dont want him to but ithink he will but he will kill voldemort
comments plz!!
Comment by mastermind — January 21, 2006 @ 11:15 am
well…
i just had a thought. jk described how dumbledores phoenix has incredible healing power so maybe he can heal dumbledore and bring him back from the dead!!
comments plz!!
also read the one above that i wrote it is very interesting!!
Comment by mastermind — January 21, 2006 @ 11:57 am
well….
i think that dumbledore is still alive and that the barman in the pub is dumbledores brother and that they swapped places so dumbledore wernt killed at all. harry always said that the barman looked strangley familiar!! and dumbledore had alredy helped him out (his bro) with a situation (can’t remember what it was it is in a previous book) so now aberforth (his ro) owed dumbledore a favor so he swapped places with him and his bro was killed!!
Also harry wil get killed!!! no i rly dont want him to but ithink he will but he will kill voldemort
comments plz!!
well…
i just had a thought. jk described how dumbledores phoenix has incredible healing power so maybe he can heal dumbledore and bring him back from the dead!!
comments plz!!
also read the one above that i wrote it is very interesting!!
As part of the funeral service, a fire ignites around the body of Dumbledore, and when it subsides, his body is encased in a white marble tomb.
Again, we don’t see the body, either before or after the fire.
But more importantly, no one lights the fire, it just happens on its own. A body bursting into flame on its own. That sound like anyone we know? We’ve seen Fawkes do that several times now in the course of the Harry Potter books, and you know what happens to Fawkes after every time it does.
Earlier in the book, we saw several instances where Dumbledore uses fire, an important aspect of the symbol of a phoenix. When he first meets Tom Riddle in the orphanage, to demonstrate he’s a wizard, he sets Tom’s wardrobe on fire. And he conjures fire to protect Harry and himself from the infiri in the cave.
And after all this, in case we didn’t get the allusions to a phoenix, J.K. reminds us just in case:
White smoke spiraled into the air and made strange shapes: Harry thought, for one heart-stopping moment, that he saw a phoenix fly joyfully into the blue, but next second the fire had vanished. (HBP pg 645/601)
All these clues seem to suggest that if Dumbledore really did die, he has the ability to be reborn out of the ashes of his death, either under his own power, or with the help of the healing powers of Fawkes.
Besides, even if Dumbledore’s body was there when it erupted into flame, we know that doesn’t mean anything to a wizard!
Comment by mastermind — January 21, 2006 @ 12:00 pm
mastermind, you seem very posotive that dumbledor is still alive and although all of your ideas are very possible i am not sure that you are correct. say if dumbledor really is still alive, then wouldn’t that mean that since he’s NOT out of the picture that voldemort ISN’T the most powerful wizerd “alive”? i think the reason that jk killed off dumbledor is because she had to make voldemort SEEM too powerful for harry to defete, so then if or when voldemort is or isn’t defeated harry’s trioumph or downfall is more dramatic and heroic. i mean, lets say that harry dies, how would it look if she murderd the main charecter in the same way she killed dumbledor. come on now, don’t you think even in a wizerding world that seems pretty supernatural. for voldemort to just take over the whole world in two deaths with minor fight from his two strongest and most powerful enimies? it only makes sence that dumbledor is dead.sorry.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 22, 2006 @ 10:02 am
check out http://www.dumbledoreisnotdead.com to check lds of reasons
Comment by mastermind — January 22, 2006 @ 3:03 pm
plz reply
Comment by PissyMissy — January 22, 2006 @ 3:57 pm
i really don’t think that jk would write another book even if it was despratly wnted by her fans because at the end of the 7th book all lose ends will be tied up and it just wouldn’t make sence to do so, at least thats what i think.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 23, 2006 @ 8:12 pm
mastermind, I am sorry to say this but i think PissyMissy has a point about dumbledore being dead sorry.
I also think that dumbledor mite not be dead and aberforth is his identical TWIN (not barman) who was hidden in dumbledores office for last meeting, then whaen harry got cloak dumbledore told aberforth what to do and what to say and that snape will kill him and aberforth agreeed as he lost the will 2 live.
Comment by Avada Kedavra — January 23, 2006 @ 11:22 pm
D. is dead get over it.
Comment by Lauren — January 24, 2006 @ 5:10 pm
I know there will be multiple people who die.
Comment by Emm — January 24, 2006 @ 5:20 pm
d. is dead get over it!!!!
Comment by Emm — January 24, 2006 @ 5:21 pm
it shouldn’t be too much of a shock for you, Emm. if you read the sixth book and still didn’t know that dumbledor was dead, i think your simply in denial.sorry
Comment by PissyMissy — January 24, 2006 @ 7:40 pm
kl coments
Comment by mastermind — January 25, 2006 @ 8:42 am
Well remeber at dumbledores funerl, harry saw dumbledores tomb light up and everyone gasped. After a minute later he thoughthe saw a phenoix fly in to the blue. Well i think dumbledore is a animagus pheniox. And i think he’s still alive! I really do, there are a lot of resons i have.
Comment by Lynx — January 25, 2006 @ 2:06 pm
If you believe that Snape is acting on Dumbledore’s orders to kill him (or possibly just make it look like he killed him, although he’d probably still be hurting him), then Snape’s demeanor and Dumbledore’s final words take on a whole new meaning.
…somebody else had spoken Snape’s name, quite softly. “Severus…” The sound frightened Harry beyond anything he had experienced all evening. For the first time, Dumbledore was pleading. Snape said nothing, but walked forward and pushed Malfoy roughly out of the way. … Snape gazed for a moment at Dumbledore, and there was revulsion and hatred etched in the harsh lines of his face. “Severus… Please…” (HBP pg 595/556)
In that passage the reader is supposed to believe that Snape hates Dumbledore and feels revulsion for him.
But to help us understand the real meaning of Snape’s feelings of revulsion and hatred, J.K. used almost the exact same words for what Harry was feeling just one chapter previous:
Comment by Lynx — January 25, 2006 @ 2:16 pm
You…you can’t stop, Professor,” said Harry. “You’ve got to keep drinking, remember? You told me you had to keep drinking. Here…” Hating himself, repulsed by what he was doing, Harry forced the goblet back toward Dumbledore’s mouth … (HBP pg 571/534)
Even though Snape was to kill Dumbledore on Dumbledore’s orders, it must have been something that was still really emotional and difficult for Snape to do, exactly as it was for Harry to make Dumbledore drink the potion.
The feeling of revulsion on Snape’s face was not for Dumbledore, but the act he knew he had to commit. The hatred was not for Dumbledore, but for what Dumbledore was making him do.
And when Dumbledore said, “Severus… Please…” he wasn’t begging “please don’t”. What he was really saying was, “Severus, please kill me, as you promised you would.”
Way back at the end the first book, when Dumbledore confirms for Harry that Flamel would die now that the philosopher’s stone was gone, Dumbledore explained:
“To one as young as you, I’m sure it seems incredible, but to Nicolas and Perenelle, it really is like going to bed after a very, very long day. After all, to the well-organised mind, death is but the next great adventure.” (SS/PS pg 297/215)
Does that sound to you like someone who would beg to save his own life?
Comment by Lynx — January 25, 2006 @ 2:17 pm
i think that snape is realy innocent because the look on his face when he killed dumbledore was hatred for himself, not hatred for dumbledore..
i also think that harry cannot be a horcrux becasue why would voldemort try to kill him so many times if he was?
Comment by Charley.. — January 25, 2006 @ 4:19 pm
hey,lynx, i think you have made some really good points. i’m still not sure whether i belive dumbledor is dead but you have somwhat convinced me on the matter, however i agree whith charley that snape felt hatred not for what dumbledor was making him do but for himself.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 26, 2006 @ 4:20 pm
lynx i totally agree with u i think ur rite !!!!!
Comment by mastermind — January 27, 2006 @ 11:54 am
heres a thaught in hp2 dobby sais to harry sommething like “dobby heard tell,’he said hoarely”that harry potter met the DARK LORD for a second time” weird coming from an elf as we know that only death eaters say dark lord.
Comment by seli — January 27, 2006 @ 2:33 pm
gd point seli maybe thers a darker side 2 dobby???!!!!
Comment by mastermind — January 28, 2006 @ 5:15 am
seli are hinting that dobby might be bad?
Comment by PissyMissy — January 28, 2006 @ 10:43 am
yes i am
Comment by seli — January 28, 2006 @ 12:34 pm
mastermind ur ideas about dumbledore are soooooo true i thought dumbledore was dead but after i read your comments nos 69 + 70 i now believe dumbledore is alive thanks mastermind for showing me the truth
Comment by cucu — January 28, 2006 @ 12:35 pm
i agree with mastermind to the comments are well worth reading
Comment by lynx — January 28, 2006 @ 12:36 pm
your so right master mind i thought dumbledore was dead but now after reading your idea nos 69+70 i have changed my mind and now think dumbldore is alive
Comment by cucu — January 28, 2006 @ 12:38 pm
i agree mastermind whoever you are your ideas rock and so do you
Comment by lynx — January 28, 2006 @ 12:39 pm
i was right pissymissy i have read that jk rowling has confirmed that abeforth is the barman at hogs head
Comment by mastermind — January 28, 2006 @ 12:47 pm
and heres the evidence
It is confirmed that the bartender in the Hog’s Head is in fact the brother of Albus Dumbledore, Aberforth Dumbledore. The evidence that he was before it was confirmed is that Harry thought the bartender looked vaguely familiar, as such would be true because of Harry’s frequent meetings with the Hogwarts headmaster and because Alastor Moody showed him a picture of Aberforth. This theory cropped up because Harry thought the bar smelled of goats and in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Albus Dumbledore revealed that his brother was convicted of practising inappropriate charms on a goat. Also, though maybe coincidentally, ‘Hog’s Head’ purports to ‘Hogwarts Headmaster’.
Comment by mastermind — January 28, 2006 @ 12:48 pm
and to also to the final battle beetween harry and voldemort, harry holds all the aces look at this:
harry can love,voldemort shows no emotion
harry isnt cursed or at least he hasnt drank any unicorn blood has he? voldemort also, will trust snape with his life after dumbledores ‘death’ and wormtail dosent hold his life yo voldemort either does he?
Comment by seli — January 28, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
i guess i can agree that aberforth is dumbledor’s brother but then couldn’t he and dumbledor have been switching places all the time. how could anyone ever be able to tell who is who if they look that alike. a will say i belive that dumbledor is still alive but is dumbledor really the one who preformed all the feats described on the chocolate frogs card or hes he and his brother shared bot the adventures and the glory. maybe aberforth was the one whos hand was injured and dumbledor did die… you know what, i am really comfused now
HELP
Comment by PissyMissy — January 28, 2006 @ 6:30 pm
i duno it is very confusing they could have been swapping all the time!!!
Comment by mastermind — January 29, 2006 @ 5:10 am
i have to say aswell iam a little convinced but if aberforth and dumbledore were switching why was aberforth in the hogs head anyway? maybe, he was there to keep an eye out on those like mundungus.
But if the prophecy was made there, surely this says that dumbledore feels it is secure thier and that is why he chose it.
who knows but i can say im pursuaded.
Comment by seli — January 29, 2006 @ 12:08 pm
i am so confused i just don’t know what to believe anymore. besides if they were switching the whole time and aberforth was the one who’s hand was injured then that would mean that dumbledor was till alive and that he really isn’t as grand as he was made out to be. that just can’t be true
Comment by PissyMissy — January 29, 2006 @ 12:59 pm
D.D is dead cause remember in the end of 1st book , when harry ask him nicholas flamel will die if he distroy philospher stone, then D.D tells harry tat 4 people of old age, when they die ,its like going 2 bed 4 them after a long time.so im very sure tat D.D is dead 4 a good reason ,i dont knw wat is tat.also , harry is not horcurex cause rowling said tat horcurex does not speak & draw attention. i am very sure tat snape is good cause if he had 2 kill why he would have tried 2 save harry in book 1st(during quidditch) , also in book 3(frm lupin when he turned werewolf. also , i was thinking tat harry & draco would team up 2 fight TO U KNOW WHO( sorry i cant take his name, hahaha), but i was worng when i read an article on a website , which stated tat JKR said tat draco and harry will hate each other untill they both die,(u noticed they both DIE ,is she going 2 kill both of them) also snape is going 2 fall in luv , he liked lilly potter , i dont if she was his love interest, cause he never said any bad things abt her, but he says abt harry father , remember when he tells harry tat ur father also used 2 walk in sleep in book 3, when harry was looking 4 peter in corridors with Maradurer’s Map so it should be important, mail me ur views at citricdust@gmail.com
Comment by nitin — January 29, 2006 @ 1:06 pm
i do think that snape may have had a crush on lily but i doubt whether or not he put actions to his feelings, that is maybe why he has so much hate for James. he also might apply his negativity tward harry because he is james’ son. if perhaps harry had been a girl then he may have shown care twords him in remebrance of lily. i would very much like for harry and draco to get together but i am not sure if that is possible because there has been so much hate building up between them for years, somthing jurestic would have to happen to cause that change.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 29, 2006 @ 5:38 pm
looking back on what seli said about dobby being bad, i just can’t see it. he has always shown so much admiration twards harry the only way i could see that happening is if he was put under some kind of curse.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 29, 2006 @ 5:39 pm
I dont think tht Snape purposely killed Dumbledore… It seems like Dumbledore himself wntd 2 die in d end as d drink made him severly sick, unbearable it ws fer him.. In d endd he said, “Severus please.” Instead of saying “Dont kill me..” Seems like he ws askin Snape 2 kill him. Snape did wht Dumbledore wished fer. Soo dis means tht Snape’s still a spy fer Dumbledore. Plus, Voldermort’s definately going 2 die in Book 7.
(P.S. Harry Potter n d Vanishing Scar is d most suitable title fer Book 7)
Comment by Ashish Verma — January 30, 2006 @ 8:47 am
i think that dumlbedore and abeforth could have swapped places but not for very important things just when D wanteda rest. and i do think that D is dead but i also think he could alive too im so confused!!
Comment by mastermind — January 30, 2006 @ 11:56 am
does anyone have any idea what the grifindor horcrux is? i cant think what it could be.
Comment by seli — January 30, 2006 @ 3:03 pm
grifindor horcrux is his Sword
Comment by scorpion_king — January 30, 2006 @ 8:06 pm
I think it is obvious that the Gryffindor horcrux is the sword harry pulled out of the hat. Well maybe it was dumbledore? Well the one person that dumbledore was always feared by was Voldemort. I think it is necessary to kill off Voldemort so Harry knows that there really is no one left but him. But pissymissy im sorry but dumbledore will return because Voldemort thinks that no one stands in his way now. There are three people dumbledore snape and harry Potter. Harry’s Scar symbolises love and apart from Sirius he has loved dumbledore. This power of love, I feel, enables Harry to bring back those who have been his parents. this means dumbledore, sirius but not his parents. Draco is actually on the good side because all of those trips to snape, he has learnt that snape is not a supporter of Voldemort and Snape is teaching draco What Voldemort’s weaknesses are so he can tell them to Harry. Snape doesn’t tell harry this because Snape gives the impression that only makes harry hate him. Harry’s power is matched to Voldemort because in the fourth book harry conjures a Expelliarmus that matches that of an avada kedavra. Plus Dumble dore couldn’t of died because if anyone dies because of the avada kedavra curse they have the life taken out of them immediately. dumbledore had been thrown back and fell down to the ground. This was because Dumbledore said a nonverbal curse that only snape and him know, this would save him. Harry stands a chance.
Comment by Ajey — January 30, 2006 @ 8:49 pm
my friend asked me the other day to explain the half blooded prince, i tried but she isn’t exactly the brightest star in the sky. can anyone here help me out please?
Comment by PissyMissy — January 30, 2006 @ 9:44 pm
WELL I JUST FOUND THIS SITE FULL OF WOULD BE POTTER FANS AND AM READING A LOT OF PERSONS COMMENTS ABOUT WHO RAB IS EVERY ONE ALREADY KNOWS BUT IS SO UNSURE WITH THEMSELVES THAT THEY QUESTION IT REGULUS BLACK IT SIRIUS BROTHER WHOS MIDDLE NAME JUST HAPPENS TO BE ALFRED! REGULUS ALFRED BLACK!!! I DONT KNOW IF ANYONE STUMBLED ON THIS AND POSTED IT LATER BUT SO FAR THE ONES THAT I HAVE READ HAVE NOT PICKED UP ON THAT FACT! ALSO OF COURSE WE KNOW THAT REGULUS WAS A DEATH EATER WHO DIED!! THE NOTE TO VOLDEMORT WAS FROM A FORMER DEATH EATER WHO DESTROYED THE HORCRUX IN THE HOPE THAT VOLDEMORT WOULD BE MORTAL BY THE TIME HE CAME FACE TO FACE WITH HARRY!!! I ALSO AGREE THAT HARRY MIGHT DIE SINCE ONE OF THEM HAS TO BECAUSE OF THE PROPHECY!!! BUT IF THEY BOTH DIE THAT WOULD JUST BE POINTLESS BECAUSE THERE WOULD THEN BE AN ETERNAL BATTLE IN WIZARD HEAVEN!!! WHERE EVERYONE WILL JUST BATTLE AND THE STORY WILL GO ON FORVER!!! ALSO JKR CANT FINISH THE BOOK IN ONE MORE BOOK THERE ARE SO MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS WHO KNOWS MAYBE SHES READING THESE COMMENTS AND TAKING IDEAS FROM US!!! THERE WILL PROBABLY BE A HARRY POTTER BOOK SEVEN VOL I THEN HARRY POTTER BOOK 7 VOL II AND SO FORTH BECAUSE ITS ALREADY SAID THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE 4 HORCRUXES LEFT SO THATS AUTOMATICALLY FOUR CHAPTERS THE BEGINING CHAPTER TO DISCLOSE THAT HARRY IS AN UNUSUAL BOY WHICH IS 5 CHAPTERS THE ENDING OF COURSE WHICH IS 6 CHAPTERS AND A BIG BATTLE BETWEEN EVERYONE GIVE IT 3 CHAPTERS SO ALL TOGETHER FROM BOOK 6 SHE LEAVES ROOM FOR AT LEAST 10 CHAPTERS AND WOULD NEED TO FILL IN THE REST OF THE 20 CHAPTERS WHICH HAVE TO EXPLAIN A LOT SIRIUSLY HA HA HA ANYWHO READ BOOK 7 AGAIN PG 248 LINE 14 IT EXPLAINS FULLY THAT SNAPE IS INNOCENT!!!
LUV YA ALL!!!
dONALD tRUMP!!!
Comment by RAB — January 31, 2006 @ 12:49 am
Book 7 will reveal R.A.B is not Regulus Black, and that R.A.B is very much alive. R.A.B was probably the second person with Voldemort when V. placed the horcrux, probably nothing to do with any lockets, in the underground lake at the cave when R.A.B was a child. The lockets are a diversion. Snape probably was present when James and Lily Potter were killed, and Snape probably loved Lily. It was Lily’s handwriting in the Half-Blood’s potion book, and she assisted Snape with his new or revised spells. Dumbledore is dead. The fact he fell is understandable as he was standing up in a tower against the parapet. I think Harry will throw Sirius’ mirror into the veil and use his broken mirror to communicate with Sirius across the veil.
Comment by Graeme — January 31, 2006 @ 9:14 am
im very sure optimist about sirius return cause no body returned frm tat well same as no body was able 2 run away frm Azkaben except sirius , also the book 5th does not say sirius died, it said it annouced his death , also guys D.D is dead plz get it nw,, he cant be a horcurx cause as i have told u before horcurx do not speak , they dont create attention & if Sword is horcurex howcum D.D disnt knw abt it, tell me…
Comment by nitin — January 31, 2006 @ 11:49 am
what about the sorting hat it only states that the founders used him by a charm to select students for houses it could be another horcrux.the ssword would probably be it though atleast griffindors horcrux what do ya think?
Comment by seli — January 31, 2006 @ 12:53 pm
I can’t believe that the sorting hat or the sword are a horcrux. Dumbledore surely would have recognized them as such and destroyed them.
Comment by Anton — January 31, 2006 @ 2:12 pm
but what if dumbledore overlooked them.and if youre right what can voldemort get to of griffindors it has to be the sword agree?
Comment by seli — January 31, 2006 @ 2:19 pm
I think that Voldemort can get his hands on a lot of artifacts that we haven’t even heard of yet. I’m also certain that we he’s either got death eaters holding the horcruxes (like the diary of Tom Riddle), and/or he’s got them hidden away much like the locket was. I’ll be surprised if any of them are at Hogwarts.
Comment by Anton — January 31, 2006 @ 2:33 pm
well malfoy (lucius) had the diary, so maybe the others could be with the deah eaters.what does harry do when the horcruxes have been destroyed.He cant use his wand because of priori incantatem, thier arent realy anyother ways of dueling what does he do any ideas?
Comment by seli — January 31, 2006 @ 3:42 pm
what would it matter about priori incantatem if harry had gotten rid of voldemort, besides he will be of wizerding age by the time of the 7th book.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 31, 2006 @ 4:03 pm
i never thought of the horcuxes being kept with death eaters, that was a great idea, i think i agree. not only with that but i doubt very much so that any hogwarts kept itams are horcuxes. it would be too risky for if it breaks or is lost by a student or staff. i doubt that voldemort would take that chance. and as Anton said before dumbledor is a smart enough wizerd to have figured it out by now if it was, especialy if your talking about the sorting hat or sward because they’d have been right in front of him the whole time. also that other dude said horcuxes can’t talk and the sorting hat can. i don’t remeber ever hearing that before but if it is true then the sorting hat was just eliminated.
Comment by PissyMissy — January 31, 2006 @ 4:09 pm
Well voldemort’s snake is a horcrux and it can talk in Snake Language.
The sword was never in Voldemort’s room. If it was fawkes would bring harry the swor instead of the sorting hat. Dumbledore never remembered the sword for it was never in his sight.
Dumbledore has to seem dead at first to keep the readers seem that there is no hope left for Harry. Dumbledore might return, along with sirius
Comment by Ajey — January 31, 2006 @ 7:14 pm
It is confirmed that Harry Potter will Die because in a recent interview with Rowling she says and i quote, ” It will be hard to live without harry, he has been such an important part of my life. I am sorry but he will have to go.
Comment by Ajey — January 31, 2006 @ 7:16 pm
I think it is obvious that the Gryffindor horcrux is the sword harry pulled out of the hat. Well maybe it was dumbledore? Well the one person that dumbledore was always feared by was Voldemort. I think it is necessary to kill off Dumbledore so Harry knows that there really is no one left but him. But pissymissy im sorry but dumbledore will return because Voldemort thinks that no one stands in his way now. There are three people dumbledore snape and harry Potter. Harry’s Scar symbolises love and apart from Sirius he has loved dumbledore. This power of love, I feel, enables Harry to bring back those who have been his parents. this means dumbledore, sirius but not his parents. Draco is actually on the good side because all of those trips to snape, he has learnt that snape is not a supporter of Voldemort and Snape is teaching draco What Voldemort’s weaknesses are so he can tell them to Harry. Snape doesn’t tell harry this because Snape gives the impression that only makes harry hate him. Harry’s power is matched to Voldemort because in the fourth book harry conjures a Expelliarmus that matches that of an avada kedavra. Plus Dumble dore couldn’t of died because if anyone dies because of the avada kedavra curse they have the life taken out of them immediately. dumbledore had been thrown back and fell down to the ground. This was because Dumbledore said a nonverbal curse that only snape and him know, this would save him. Harry stands a chance.
Comment by Ajey — January 31, 2006 @ 7:17 pm
whos going to be the new head of hogwarts that is if dumbledore is dead? and has snape left hogwarts? if he has left then surely lupin will return maybe with tonks dont think mcgonagals expierienced enough for the heads job what do ya think?
Comment by seli — February 1, 2006 @ 11:41 am
ajey i wud like 2 no da website dat u found da interview sayin dat jk has killed harry off??
Comment by mastermind — February 1, 2006 @ 12:42 pm
mcgganol is going 2 be the new head , as it was explained in the end of last book 6. DUMBLEDORE is dead guys get over it nw , except it
Comment by nitin — February 1, 2006 @ 2:52 pm
i do think mcgonagal is going to be the new head, snape probubly would leave because voldemort only wanted him there to spy on harry and dumbledor wanted him there to help look out for harry. i think that maybe since maganagal is going to be head mistress then maybe hermione would take her place as head of house and transfiguration teacher. i doubt whether tonks or lupin will teach again though because they will be too busy woth the order to bother teaching again. also i don’t think no matter how qualified they are that the ministry would let either of them teach. plus tonks might not want to teach because she was so sad about sisious.
Comment by PissyMissy — February 1, 2006 @ 4:27 pm
Snake can’t be horcurx since it can speak (snake language), GUYS HORCURX DONT SPEAK THEY DONT DRAW ATTENTION. i think gryffondor horcurx is something we dont knw, something new… as may be u all knw , JKR has said there is gone be a lot killings in the 7th book , she is probably gone kill more than half of people.. i hope harry is not one of them
Comment by nitin — February 1, 2006 @ 9:47 pm
Mastermind, it isn’t an article, it was a newspaper article in the Hindustan times.
Comment by Ajey — February 1, 2006 @ 11:27 pm
You guys are always talking about the prophecy and how it can’t be that both die. The prophecy could have been about Neville, although the scar was given to Harry. Neville will have a very important role in book 7. Neville will probably be saved and harry and Voldemort would die. The way you guys are thinking is way too complicated. remember, Rowling is making this book for ages 11 and up. it has to be comprehendable to the readers
Comment by Ajey — February 1, 2006 @ 11:32 pm
we all cant be wrong ajay you have to sceptisise for instance masterminds views on aberforth are hrd enough to understand but it is a big possibility all the sighns point to him being right i also believe alot of what the others say jk puts the clues there for instance i still think dobby is bad because he keeps repeating “dark lord” and again only death eaters say dark lord
Comment by seli — February 2, 2006 @ 8:29 am
guys it is not neville , i dont remember the website , but it stated tat prophecy is only related 2 harry & it was an big article written by jkr herself,. she said neville has an important role in 7th book , but prophecy is only related 2 harry , remember it ” one have 2 die 4 other 2 survive” but both can die 2. also as u all might remember neville bought his own wand @ olivander in 6th book , so it might increase his confidence, also trewlenvey predicted death 4 harry in book 3 , remeber black dog , omen of death, i dont knw wat it is , I CANT WAIT 4 7TH ONE……………
Comment by nitin — February 2, 2006 @ 11:10 am
seli i totally agree wiv u also i think dobby might be bad after wot u sed cus only death eaters call voldemort dark lord and dobby could have been planted with harry by the malfoys
Comment by mastermind — February 2, 2006 @ 11:11 am
tats very nice point , its coming in my mind 2 tat dobby can be bad , if we collect the data , dobby tried 2 make harry away frm school, i think , so he would nt be able 2 knw abt chamber , , & he wont be able 2 intrupt and voldemort would be back with out pro, also he helped harry 2 get gillyweeds so he can get thru 2nd tast of triwizard tournament in book 4,, all this brings questions in my mind
Comment by nitin — February 2, 2006 @ 12:25 pm
i think think you could compare dobby to snape in many ways for instance,snape is apparantly a death eater but works for dumbledore.its the opposite for dobby he is apparantly a trustworthy friend and elf but,he is a death eater.
how do we know that he isnt? its like what nitin says about him(131)each time he has orders or atleast it seems he does from known death eaters.when he sealed the platform to nine and three quarters he was acting on the malfoys orders.then he helps give the gillyweed on crouch jr orders both are death eaters.
lastly,there was a period when dobby was set free how do we know he didnt find his master (voldemort) whilst out there and he told him to keep close to harry.what do ya think?
Comment by seli — February 2, 2006 @ 3:30 pm
egnore 131 i meant 134 sorry
Comment by seli — February 2, 2006 @ 3:31 pm
i didn’t think dobby could be bad but you guys made some really good points.why do you think it is that rowling let the directers of the fourth movie take dobby out of the movie entirly. it was kind of weird how neville took his place don’t you think?
Comment by PissyMissy — February 2, 2006 @ 3:55 pm
alright well listen the prophecy is not about Neville because Voldemort made it about him and harry. the prophecy said that he would mark one as his equal. he did not know of neville so he went to godric’s hollow to kill harry but harry got the scar(the mark that made him voldemort’s equal). the sword is not a horcrux because it was always with dumbledore. dumbledore isn’t a horcrux because he can draw attention to himself. Voldemort’s snake is a horcrux because they said it in book 6. dobby is not bad. in book five at the ministry of magic there was a statue of a noble wizard, a centaur, and a house-elf. that can turn into Dobby, Harry, and Firenze the centaur teacher at hogwarts for Firenze cannot return to the forest. i don’t know if dumbledore is dead because the Avada Kedavra makes the person drop lifelessly to the ground but dumbledore went flying into the air. i also reread order of the phoenix and at the ministry in the end at the fight, dumbledore performs a spell that sent a jet of red light and voldemort had to pull out a silver shield with a snake on it to deflect it. i think the sheild could be a horcrux because a lot of Slytherin’s things are and that there is something more about that spell than we know
Comment by Anonymous — February 2, 2006 @ 8:51 pm
Ok, dumby is alive. Harry is horcrux. Regulus is rab. Hermione and ron die, hagrid dies and Mrs W dies.JK said harry dies and neville has big part. Snapey is in luv wit lilly and lilly almost falls in luv wit him. The first word of the title is Dumbledore’s ?????????????? dobby is not evil, Neville becomes smart and becomes Minister and aberforth dose not switch places wit dumby. The one who overheard snape in spin’s end waz Tonkz and da fox waz animagus. Who? I won’t tell you. You must guess but it waz someone who died
Comment by kira — February 2, 2006 @ 9:37 pm
Hey Kira was it someone in jame’s and sirius’ gang?
was it aberforthe.
Was it regulus Black?
or was it snape?
Comment by Ajey — February 2, 2006 @ 10:39 pm
C’mon just tell us for god’s sake!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Ajey — February 2, 2006 @ 10:39 pm
im sorry kira youre info is way to farfetched, no plot can carry so many deaths.neville may become smart but i very much doubt him being minister for magic.
where did you get this from anyway cause i would love to see it.
why dont you tell us? or dont you know?
sorry to be so critical but honestly youre plot is insane!!!
Comment by seli — February 3, 2006 @ 12:15 pm
Greetings all,
Since this is a rather popular discussion, I have started a new blog for book 7 rumors. You can register to be an author if your interested and post your own rumors as articles. This might help spread the discussion across multiple posts so it’s a little easier to read.
You can find the blog here: http://potter.lr2.com/
Thanks!
Anton
Comment by Anton — February 3, 2006 @ 12:38 pm
kira , does not matter where u get it , but listen HARRY CANT BE A HORCUREX, HORCUREX DONT SPEAK & DRAW ATTENTION , OK…GOT IT…Yes there r deaths in 7th book , but no body knws yet , who r them, but there r LOTS of deaths, nevile has imporatant role but he wont kill voldemort cause then i think it should nt be harry potter book series, it should rather be a neville Longbottom series……….wt u guys say
Comment by nitin — February 3, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
nitin, i think you need to calm down a bit. kira, i think you have some really good ideas but that’s all they are, ideas. nobody knows the facts yet. i agree with seli.
Comment by PissyMissy — February 3, 2006 @ 5:12 pm
could maybe lucius malfoy’s cane be a slytherine horcux. and i was also thinking(this most likly isn’t going to happen) but wouldn’t it be funny if rowling ebded the book with a global warming and harry and voldemort never douling. i would be so mad wouldn’t you?
Comment by PissyMissy — February 3, 2006 @ 5:30 pm
ye mad pissymissy bot as if that wud happen!!!!
Comment by mastermind — February 4, 2006 @ 10:03 am
in the order of the phoenix the battle at the end has to have more significance than we think.maybe its a spell? or maybe we se another hocrux it has to show something. what do ya think?
Comment by seli — February 4, 2006 @ 10:49 am
i agree wiv seli cuz the battle isn’t goin to commence at night when its quiet cuz it would wake up da whole of da skool + da deatheaters would be out numbered. i dont think that was a horcrux, but there could be a horcrux in the chamber of secrets like da big statue at da end of the room where da snake cums out of. wot do ya fink?
Comment by caper — February 4, 2006 @ 11:00 am
guys i dont know whether you know but jk has admitted(oficial site) that fabian and gideon are molly weasleys bros and jk says thats why shes so over protective and that thier deaths have not particulay significance to the final plot, but by using “particulay” it does reveal something.
any ideas?
Comment by seli — February 4, 2006 @ 12:33 pm
You guys Harry can draw attention to himself but he can’t say he is a horcrux. He himself does not know what do you say about that
Comment by Ajey — February 4, 2006 @ 1:10 pm
I think Kira might have a point about the deaths. In the very beggining of this page it states that there were gonna be more deaths in the coming books. Harry might not die but it is most probable
Comment by Ajey — February 4, 2006 @ 1:12 pm
i agree wiv ajey + kira. i fink dat it is most likely for harry to die in da last book cuz den jk wudnt av to carry on da buks. in da last buk i fink harry find s da remainin horcruxes + kills voldemort by destroyin da horcruxes together. den dobby will probly kill harry 4 killin his master.
Comment by caper — February 4, 2006 @ 5:31 pm
wot do ya fink?
Comment by caper — February 4, 2006 @ 5:33 pm
dobby doesn’t have a master that’s why he works at hogwarts sorry caper but that’s not gonna work. dobby likes being free and in book 2 dobby fought mr malfoy because he tried to hurt harry
Comment by Anonymous — February 4, 2006 @ 7:27 pm
Now we know that Harry has his mother’s eyes and many people have commented on it, almost too many people. I mean, why would so many people remember Lilly’s eye color? I’m thinking Lilly was Celtic, with her coloring it certainly is possible. Celtic magic(the magic of the elves) is ancient magic, which is what Dumbledore said was protecting Harry at Privet Drive through his mother’s blood. So, Lilly may have had a little elf magic in her from way back in her family line, and she passed this on to Harry.
Now the elf we know is Dobby, who has the sam